Phonetics vs. Phonology
1.
Phonetics vs. phonology
Phonetics deals with the production of speech sounds by humans, often
without prior knowledge of the language being spoken. Phonology is about patterns of sounds, especially different
patterns of sounds in different languages, or within each language, different
patterns of sounds in different positions in words etc.
2.
Phonology as grammar of phonetic patterns
- The consonant cluster /st/ is OK at the
beginning, middle or end of words in English.
- At beginnings of words, /str/ is OK in English,
but /ftr/ or /tr/ are not (they are ungrammatical).
- /tr/ is OK in the middle of words,
however, e.g. in "ashtray".
- /tr/ is OK at the beginnings of words in
German, though, and /ftr/ is OK word-initially in Russian, but not in
English or German.
3. A given sound have a different function or status in the sound
patterns of different languages
For
example, the glottal stop [] occurs in both English and Arabic BUT ...
In
English, at the beginning of a word, [] is a just way of beginning vowels, and does
not occur with consonants. In the middle or at the end of a word, [] is one possible pronunciation of /t/ in
e.g. "pat" [pa].
In
Arabic, // is a consonant sound like any other (/k/,
/t/ or whatever): [íktib] "write!", [daíia] "minute (time)", [a] "right".
4.
Phonemes and allophones, or sounds and their variants
The
vowels in the English words "cool", "whose" and
"moon" are all similar but slightly different. They are three
variants or allophones of the /u/ phoneme. The different variants are dependent
on the different contexts in which they occur. Likewise, the consonant phoneme
/k/ has different variant pronunciations in different contexts. Compare:
keep
|
/kip/
|
The place of articulation is
fronter in the mouth
|
[k+h]
|
cart
|
/kt/
|
The place of articulation is
not so front in the mouth
|
[kh]
|
coot
|
/kut/
|
The place of articulation is
backer, and the lips are rounded
|
[khw]
|
seek
|
/sik/
|
There is less aspiration than
in initial position
|
[k`]
|
scoop
|
/skup/
|
There is no aspiration after
/s/
|
[k]
|
These
are all examples of variants according to position (contextual variants). There
are also variants between speakers and dialects. For example, "toad"
may be pronounced [tëUd] in high-register RP, [toUd] or [tod] in the North. All of them are different
pronunciations of the same sequence of phonemes. But these differences can lead
to confusion: [toUd] is "toad" in one dialect, but
may be "told" in another.
5.
Phonological systems
Phonology
is not just (or even mainly) concerned with categories or objects (such as consonants, vowels, phonemes,
allophones, etc.) but is also crucially about relations.
For example, the English stops and fricatives can be grouped into related pairs
which differ in voicing and (for the stops) aspiration:
Voiceless/aspirated
|
ph
|
th
|
kh
|
f
|
s
|
|
|
h
|
Voiced/unaspirated
|
b
|
d
|
|
v
|
z
|
ð
|
|
(unpaired)
|
Patterns
lead to expectations: we expect the voiceless fricative [h] to be paired with a
voiced [], but we do not find this sound as a
distinctive phoneme in English. And in fact /h/ functions differently from the
other voiceless fricatives (it has a different distribution in words etc.) So
even though [h] is phonetically classed as a voiceless fricative, it
is phonologically quite different from /f/, /s/, // and //.
Different
patterns are found in other languages. In Classical Greek a three-way
distinction was made between stops:
Voiceless/aspirated
|
ph
|
th
|
kh
|
Voiced/unaspirated
|
p
|
t
|
k
|
Voiced (and unaspirated)
|
b
|
d
|
|
In
Hindi-Urdu a four-way pattern is found, at five places of articulation:
Voiceless aspirated
|
ph
|
th
|
h
|
ch
|
kh
|
Voiceless unaspirated
|
p
|
t
|
|
c
|
k
|
Voiced unaspirated
|
b
|
d
|
etc.
|
|
|
Breathy voiced ("voiced aspirates")
|
b
|
d
|
etc.
|
|
|
6.
Shapes of vowel systems: some common examples:
Triangular:
(e.g. Arabic) |
3 vowels
|
|
|
Triangular:
(e.g. Japanese) |
5 vowels
|
|
i
|
|
u
|
|
i
|
|
u
|
|
|
|
|
e
|
|
o
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triangular:
(e.g. Tübatulabal) |
6 vowels
|
|
|
Triangular:
(e.g. Italian) |
7 vowels
|
|
i
|
|
u
|
|
i
|
|
u
|
e
|
|
o
|
|
e
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triangular:
(e.g. Bulgarian) |
6 vowels
|
|
|
Rectangular:
(e.g. Montenegrin) |
6 vowels
|
|
i
|
|
u
|
|
i
|
u
|
|
e
|
|
o
|
|
e
|
o
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
How many
degrees of vowel height are there in Bulgarian? On the face of things, it
appears to be not very different from Tübatulabal, which has three heights:
three high vowels, two mid vowels and one low vowel. But if we look more
closely into Bulgarian phonology, we see that the fact that schwa is similar in
height to /e/ and /o/ is coincidental: the distinction that matters in
Bulgarian is /i/ vs. /e/, /u/ vs. /o/ and // vs. /a/, i.e. relatively high vs.relatively low. As evidence for this statement,
note that while all six vowels may occur in stressed syllables, only /i/, /e/,
// and /u/ occur in unstressed syllables.
7.
Phonology as interpretation of phonetic patterns: Fang (Bantu: Cameroon , Gabon ,
Equatorial Guinea )
|
Fang
|
English
|
|
|
Fang
|
English
|
1)
|
etf-
|
shoulder
|
|
7)
|
tm
|
branch
|
2)
|
vbi,v-bi
|
hippopotamus
|
|
8)
|
bikq
|
back teeth
|
3)
|
ndv()
|
dam
|
|
9)
|
eln
|
water tortoise
|
4)
|
kf-l
|
tortoise
|
|
10)
|
fq
|
bag
|
5)
|
kf-
|
salt
|
|
11)
|
t
|
neck
|
6)
|
kl
|
rope
|
|
12)
|
osn
|
squirrel
|
Vowels
in corpus:
i
|
y
|
|
?u expected but not found
|
e
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
Further
reading
Lass, R.
(1984) Phonology: an
introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson,
R. (1962) The phonemic concept of distinctive features. In A. Sovijärvi and P.
Aalto, eds. Proceedings of the
Fourth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Mouton & Co. 440-455.
Jakobson,
R. and M. Halle (1956) Fundamentals
of Language. Mouton.
Kelly,
J. (1974) Close vowels in Fang. Bulletin
of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37, 119-123.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar